Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tomdkat
Man, Elwood and Moogle really got into it, didn't they. 
I haven't read their posts (now I know how you guys feel when I get into a long winded debate with someone  ) but I trust this summary is basically accurate. I think both Elwood and Moogle are right. I think nudity for the pure sake of nudity does objectify women but that's not the same as saying any instance of a nude woman objectifies her. I'm all for nudity if it's relevant to the story and presented in an appropriate way. If the director chooses to make the nudity more gratuitous, that's something for the actor and director to work out and hopefully they can work something out that preserves the integrity of the story while not putting the actor in an awkward position.
Ultimately, the actor has a choice. If the choice the actor makes hinders his/her career, that's too bad but the way it is.
Peace... |
I was hoping for more intellectual background history, but it's time to call it quits.