Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sub780lime
BB did an awesome job with its villians because the stories were developed independently and then there was a small tie in at the end when we discovered that only one was truly a formidable villain. Have too many is just too hard to do, especially going the old team up route.
|
Well, if BB was able to handle two villains, especially with independent storylines and agendas, then I'm sure The Joker and whoever can also have different agendas.
Quote:
|
Who were truly the villains in X-men 1....It was magneto. Though their was a group, he was truly the villain...so thats one with some additional minor characters.
|
Maybe, but there were obviously multiple enemies and multiple enemies, and it didn't suck. Except for Storm.
Quote:
|
Superman 2, still a group, with one main villain, ZOD. He led, he made the decision, and the others followed. I dont think these are good examples of how multiple villains can work.
|
But there was also Luthor to contend with as well. But still multiple enemies for Superman, and I thought Superman 2 was the best one.
Quote:
|
I most see Anthony Michael Hall villain the KillerCroc role (based on his look alone). Penguin doesnt work for me. Clayface is possible, though I automatically think of Michael Mann for that.
|
I would think that TDK would go for more obscure Batman villains, like with Scarecrow and Ra's al Ghull. But with the Joker as the main enemy, I could see another more well known villain come out. If I was good at photoshop, I would photoshop the Riddler outfit over AMH's picture, and you would see that he could very well be The Riddler.