View Single Post
Old 01-03-2008, 09:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
Taxi
Admin Emeritus
 
Taxi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Orygun
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruined View Post
Very simple: Reon/HQV video processing. Silicon Optix's chipsets have proven to be king of video processing for SD and HD. On the high end $2k model, Denon uses Silicon Optix HQV processing, so it therefore implies that HQV is better than Denon's standard processing on the $1.2k model.

The Samsung also has HQV, except it is $1200 cheaper (and supports an additional format, too). It is not quite as full featured as the HQV on the $2k Denon, but I'd bet my britches it beats out the $1.2k Denon.
I don't think you're thinking like a transport. This receiver (which I'm sure will pair nicely with the BT2500) has the HQV processor that you're talking about.

Edit: So does this one.
__________________
Admin Emeritus | DDS#42
No, I am not back.
Eschew obfuscation.
Taxi is offline   Reply With Quote