View Single Post
Old 04-04-2008, 07:09 PM   #18 (permalink)
ganthc
Actor
 
ganthc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: "Vyenna", VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruined View Post
I think the target filesize for HD downloads will likely be 4-7GB/each, at least for now. At that size, you can either have video encoded at 720p with little to no artifacting, or at 1080p with a lot of artifacting. Lower resolution with less artifacting is a better choice, IMO. 1080p without artifacts would be 8-15GB with much higher peak rates as well (killing streaming possibilities), which is unrealistic ATM.

In other words, I think you are doing a disservice for asking for "True 1080p" because by demanding this you will get an overall crappier picture due to artifacting, even though it might be higher resolution. 720p w/o artifacts upconverted to 1080p is a much more feasible choice and will have better picture quality for downloads in the end IMO.
Or you can eliminate the need to compromise on quality and just keep HDM on disc going. It's a proven and successful media format, and it is available right now. I think prices will fall on bd players/media than we'll see a viable setup for downloads or flashdrives of HD content within the next 5 years.
__________________
HOOK'EM!!!
UT LONGHORNS - National Champs 2005-2006!!!
http://ganthc.youaremighty.com
ganthc is offline   Reply With Quote