![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Actor
Join Date: Nov 2001
|
Home Audio Questions
I have some questions:
1) Harmon Kardon and Onkyo receivers are high current. How much better is that than say a Sony or Pioneer? Is a 350 Watt Harmon Kardon recevier going to be enough for Polk Monitor50 floorstanding speakers for FRONT RIGHT &LEFT, Monitor30 for rears, 150watt sub, and center channel? If the high current receivers are only like 350 watts and give like 55watts per channel, is that going to be better than like a Sony or Pioneer receiver that can do 100 watts per channel? I am sure the answer is yes, Im just not sure why Make sense?2) A friend of mine has a problem with his system. He has an Onkyo receiver (dont know the model but its 350watt total) and when he turns it on it just shuts itself off and mentions something about "amps" on the display. Anyone know the problem? Thanks for any response. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Official Forum Warmonger
"Dial Tone" Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hayward, CA, USA
|
I'm not an audio expert but I was under the impression more watts per channel is a good thing.
Peace...
__________________
My DVD Aficionado List "At last we shall reveal ourselves to the Jedi, at last we shall have revenge!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Actor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Ft Worth
|
More watts is good, if the amp is good. If it's a P.O.S, then 200w per channel will sound like crap.
Onkyo, Harmon Kardon, Pioneer and Denon will outperform Sony any day of the week. Any of the above you mentioned would do nicely for your speakers. The reason they are better, well it' all about quality of the components in the reciever, the DACs particularly. Sony recievers sound very hollow compared to most everything else. HK and Onkyo make nice products, but for my money you can't beat Denon. I just love the sound of them. If you can go somewhere and get an A-B comparison between the amps your considering, you'll be amazed how different they sound. Try to listen to them with speaker simular to your own, if not the same speakers. Never heard of problems like your friend is having.
__________________
“The more things change, the more they stay the same.” Snake Plissken Plissken's DVD, HD-DVD and Blu Ray collection And Plissken's home theater |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Would Make a Good Incubus
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere near Nebraska
|
you should really be looking at power bandwidth and frequency response, as well as the SUSTAINED watts (not peak performance, which all the low-end receivers advertise). a 65 watt/channel HK receiver easily outperforms an entry level sony/pioneer/panasonic 100 watt receiver. If an amp rates at 100 watts/channel, but can only deliver that power to the mid-range, you're going to hear very loud tinny sounds (which people will usually compensate with by cranking their subs...)
BTW, although entry-level Sony receivers leave something to be desired (especially in their power supplies), Sony ES receivers/amps are fantastic - I would put them up against any brand in their price range. Last edited by videoworx : 12-10-2004 at 12:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Actor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Shell Beach, CA, USA
|
There is no rule that companies have to follow about their specs. Often, those "Best Buy" recievers are tested to reach 100 watts with only 2 speaker driven. However, I am guessing that most of the time you will be watching 5.1 or 7.1 movies, so the receiver will be considerably less powerful with all of the channels driven.
About your friend, I sometimes have that problem if my speaker wires are touching somewhere. Since my speaker wires sometimes move, they sometimes hit each other, which causes the receiver to shut down. And I have to find where the problem occured.
__________________
I balked, now the proud owner of both formats. I am now bi-partisan. I enjoy what both red and blue have to offer. My Theater MySpace |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Producer/Admin
NSFW Off 'the list' Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sacto, Ca --Near Galt, home of LeVar Burton
|
Right now, for the money Denon is hard to beat. I would look there first, but all the advice above is great.
Also look into Yamaha and Marantz. Marantz has a lot of great products in the mid range, especially if you're looking for something in the $500 area. I would aso say I'm not particularly fond of Harmon Kardon. I think their quality has plumeted in the past few years.
__________________
The Order of the Zombie. The world's greatest zombie culture website. "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wagn'nagl dominos" In his house in R'lyeh, dead Cthulhu waits for the pizza delivery guy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||
|
Silent Director/Silent Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Burlington, Ontario
|
Re: Home Audio Questions
Quote:
I would also like to recommend Marantz receivers as a nice brand to buy. I have a 2 year old Marantz SR 4300 receiver that i got for almost $700 Canadian with taxes. But the new receivers seem to be a bit cheaper now when they hit the market. Just went to check there site and it seems like they have their new models coming out soon, and it looks like they will all be 7.1 receivers. Marantz SR 4500 can be found on this site for $350. Its a 7.1 receiver with lots of power, inputs with tons of bells and whistles too. Its basically my receiver 2 years later Now i don't shop online a lot so i don't know if the site is a good place to order from. But here are the specs for the units from Marantz Quote:
__________________
SilentBob's DVD's Supporting both HD-DVD and Blu-ray XBOX LIVE: luvthempocket8s PS3 ONLINE: pokerlover |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|